Chapter 01 · 47 verses
अर्जुनविषादयोगः
Arjuna-viṣāda-yoga
Arjuna’s sorrow
What happens when duty becomes unbearable?
Before Krishna teaches, Arjuna looks. What he recognizes on the battlefield makes the victory he came to seek almost impossible to desire.
What happens here
A turn in the
conversation.
The Gita begins within another conversation. Dhritarashtra, the blind king, asks Sanjaya what happened when his sons and the sons of Pandu assembled at Kurukshetra. His division between 'my sons' and the Pandavas establishes the family fracture before any weapon moves. The field is named as a field of dharma, yet that name does not make its human choices simple. The question of right action enters through a place where competing claims are already armed.
Duryodhana surveys the opposing forces and speaks to his teacher Drona. His catalogue of warriors presents the battle through military strength, loyalties, and protection. Conches then sound on both sides. The names of the instruments and the people who hold them give the scene density: these are particular participants, not anonymous symbols in a lesson. Sanjaya lets the reader hear the approaching conflict before drawing attention to a single chariot.
Arjuna asks Krishna to place that chariot between the armies. Initially he wants to inspect the people he must fight. But inspection becomes recognition. Teachers, uncles, cousins, sons, friends, and relatives stand on both sides. His body responds before his argument is complete: limbs fail, his mouth dries, his skin burns, and his bow slips. The accomplished warrior can no longer inhabit the role that had seemed to organize the situation.
He argues against the battle through affection, the guilt of killing, and the destruction of family obligations. His reasoning carries both moral seriousness and the social assumptions of his world. Krishna does not yet answer these arguments. The chapter ends with Arjuna putting down his weapons and sinking into the chariot. A refusal has been spoken, but a settled understanding has not been reached. That unresolved space becomes the beginning of the teaching.
What did my sons and the Pandavas do on the field of dharma?
Place the chariot between the armies. Let me see whom I must face.
I see my own people. What could victory give us after their destruction?
Chapter essence
The conversation begins when an inherited role no longer settles what is right. Arjuna's grief exposes a conflict that strength and certainty alone cannot answer.
Key movements
Follow the
argument.
1.1–11
A family conflict becomes a military formation
Dhritarashtra's question and Duryodhana's assessment establish two ways of seeing the battlefield: family possession and strategic advantage. The warriors are counted, named, and assigned significance. Duryodhana's comparison of the armies in 1.10 permits different readings, confidence in unlimited strength or anxiety about insufficient protection. The ambiguity fits a speech that seeks assurance as well as displaying power. In either reading, Bhishma's safety matters greatly. The coming dialogue begins inside these relationships of dependence, rivalry, and authority.
1.12–19
The sound before the teaching
Bhishma's conch answers Duryodhana's concern, and a tumult of instruments follows. Krishna and Arjuna sound their own conches, joined by the Pandava allies. This is more than a decorative opening. The sequence communicates the scale and immediacy of an encounter that philosophical language might otherwise make abstract. A decision must be made in a world already moving toward violence. The sudden concentration on Arjuna therefore interrupts momentum; it does not occur in the safety of an isolated classroom.
1.20–27
The chariot changes the view
Arjuna requests a position from which he can see the opposing warriors. Krishna places him before Bhishma, Drona, and the assembled rulers, naming them as Kurus. The enemies do not cease to be enemies, but they become visible as members of the same extended world. Arjuna's earlier categories cannot contain what he now recognizes. Looking is consequential here: it restores particular faces and relationships to a situation that military purpose had organized more cleanly. Knowledge begins by making action harder.
1.28–39
The body speaks, then the argument
Arjuna's distress takes physical form before he reasons about it. His speech then asks what enjoyment, power, or life could mean without the people for whom they were desired. He identifies the opposing side as aggressors yet fears the wrong of killing them. The tension should remain audible. Neither mere cowardice nor uncomplicated moral enlightenment describes everything the text presents. He sees a real cost and also struggles to determine which obligations that cost should outweigh.
1.40–47
An inherited world under threat
The argument widens from immediate deaths to the loss of family rites and social continuity. Arjuna speaks through inherited ideas about lineage, gender, social class, and obligations to ancestors. A responsible reading identifies those ideas rather than quietly endorsing or erasing them. Finally he says he would prefer to die unarmed than kill his own people. Sanjaya closes the chapter with the bow put aside. The act of stopping is complete; the work of understanding has only begun.
Selected key verses
Stay with the words.
The Sanskrit, an original translation, and a way into the meaning.
Bhagavad Gita 1.21Arjuna · in the dialogue
Between the armies
He spoke these words to Hrishikesha, O king. Arjuna said: Achyuta, place my chariot between the two armies,
Original King of Dwarka translation · Complete verse
Why this verse matters
Arjuna asks for a clearer view before acting. The verse crosses from Sanjaya's narration into Arjuna's request, so its opening words address Dhritarashtra, while the second line addresses Krishna. That change of speaker matters. The chariot's position will let Arjuna see more than an opposing force: it will bring teachers and relatives into the field of moral attention.
Explore deeper
The request is not yet the decision to stop fighting. Arjuna initially wants to inspect those he must face. What follows exceeds that intention. A useful reading preserves the sequence: he asks to see, recognizes his own people, experiences distress, and then begins to argue. Knowledge is not presented as an effortless clarification. Here it unsettles the very action for which the warrior has prepared.
Bhagavad Gita 1.31Arjuna · in the dialogue
The cost of victory
I see ominous signs, Keshava, and can see no good in killing my own people in battle.
Original King of Dwarka translation · Complete verse
Why this verse matters
Arjuna cannot see a good outcome in killing his own people. The statement combines perceived omens with a moral judgment, and both belong to his experience of the battlefield. It is an objection within the dialogue, not the final teaching of the Gita. Its force comes from asking whether the desired achievement can retain its value after the destruction it requires.
Explore deeper
The word shreyas concerns good or benefit in a deeper sense than immediate pleasure. Arjuna's later request in 2.7 will ask Krishna to establish that good decisively. The continuity is important: he already has reasons, but he does not yet possess a settled account of their relation. Reading this verse beside the next chapter allows compassion, attachment, uncertainty, and the search for right action to remain distinct without separating them from one another.
Bhagavad Gita 1.47Sanjaya · to Dhritarashtra
The bow is put aside
Sanjaya said: Having spoken in this way on the battlefield, Arjuna sank down in the chariot, putting aside his bow and arrows, his mind shaken by grief.
Original King of Dwarka translation · Complete verse
Why this verse matters
Sanjaya ends the chapter with an embodied action: Arjuna sits down and relinquishes his weapons. The narrator names grief as the condition shaking his mind. The gesture arrests the battlefield's momentum, but it does not resolve the ethical problem. The conversation can begin because the warrior's previous understanding no longer enables him to proceed.
Explore deeper
This is not a failure scene added only to make later resolve impressive. It establishes the human situation in which teaching becomes necessary. The Gita will explore enduring selfhood and disciplined action, but those claims arrive after a person has been made vulnerable by what action could cost. Letting the chapter end here, without rushing to Krishna's answer, preserves the seriousness of that vulnerability and the openness of the question it creates.
Read the full chapter
The whole conversation
matters.
All 47 verses, with Sanskrit, IAST transliteration and original King of Dwarka English.
Read Chapter 147 verses · Sanskrit & English
Use the peacock feather above to mark your place. Sources & editions
1.1Dhritarashtra
Dhritarashtra asked: Sanjaya, when my sons and the sons of Pandu gathered, eager for battle, on the field of dharma at Kurukshetra, what did they do?
1.2Sanjaya
Sanjaya said: Seeing the Pandava army drawn up for battle, King Duryodhana approached his teacher and spoke.
1.3
Teacher, look at this great army of Pandu's sons, arranged by your gifted pupil, the son of Drupada.
1.4
Here stand heroic bowmen, the equals of Bhima and Arjuna in battle: Yuyudhana, Virata, and Drupada, a mighty chariot warrior;
1.5
Dhrishtaketu, Chekitana, the valiant king of Kashi, Purujit, Kuntibhoja, and Shaibya, foremost among men;
1.6
the daring Yudhamanyu, the powerful Uttamauja, Subhadra's son, and Draupadi's sons, all mighty chariot warriors.
1.7
Now hear who is distinguished among us, best of brahmins. I will name the leaders of my army so that you may recognize them.
1.8
You yourself, Bhishma, Karna, Kripa, victorious in battle, Ashvatthama, Vikarna, and Somadatta's son;
1.9
and many other heroes, ready to give their lives for me, bearing weapons of many kinds, all accomplished in warfare.
1.10
Our force, guarded by Bhishma, is without limit; their force, guarded by Bhima, has its limits.
Aparyāpta can be understood as unlimited or insufficient. This rendering takes Duryodhana to boast of his army's immeasurable strength; another reading hears anxiety about its adequacy. The contrast with paryāpta permits a materially different account of his tone.
1.11
All of you, stationed in your assigned positions at every approach, must protect Bhishma above all.
1.12
Then the mighty grandsire, eldest of the Kurus, heartened Duryodhana by sounding a loud lion's roar and blowing his conch.
1.13
At once conches, kettledrums, smaller drums, great drums, and horns sounded together. The noise became a tumult.
1.14
Then Madhava and Pandu's son, standing in their great chariot yoked to white horses, sounded their divine conches.
1.15
Hrishikesha sounded Panchajanya and Dhananjaya sounded Devadatta; Bhima, wolf-bellied and terrible in deeds, blew the great conch Paundra.
1.16
King Yudhishthira, Kunti's son, sounded Anantavijaya; Nakula and Sahadeva sounded Sughosha and Manipushpaka.
1.17
The king of Kashi, supreme among bowmen, Shikhandi the mighty chariot warrior, Dhrishtadyumna, Virata, and unconquered Satyaki;
1.18
Drupada, Draupadi's sons, and Subhadra's strong-armed son each sounded their own conches, ruler of the earth.
1.19
That tumultuous sound, reverberating through earth and sky, tore into the hearts of Dhritarashtra's sons.
1.20
Then Pandu's son, whose banner bore the monkey, saw Dhritarashtra's sons drawn up. As weapons were about to clash, he raised his bow.
1.21Sanjaya / Arjuna
He spoke these words to Hrishikesha, O king. Arjuna said: Achyuta, place my chariot between the two armies,
The first half continues Sanjaya's narration; Arjuna begins speaking within this numbered verse. Some editions divide the surrounding half-verses differently. The dialogue has not lost a line.
1.22
so that I may look at those standing here eager to fight, those with whom I must contend in this undertaking of battle.
1.23
Let me see those who have assembled to fight, wishing to please Dhritarashtra's ill-judging son in this war.
1.24Sanjaya
Sanjaya said: Addressed in this way by Gudakesha, Hrishikesha placed the splendid chariot between the two armies, descendant of Bharata,
1.25
before Bhishma, Drona, and all the rulers. He said: Partha, look at these Kurus assembled here.
1.26
There Partha saw fathers and grandfathers, teachers, maternal uncles, brothers, sons, grandsons, and companions standing before him;
1.27
fathers-in-law and friends as well, in both armies. Seeing all these kinsmen standing there, Kunti's son
1.28Sanjaya / Arjuna
was overcome with deep compassion and spoke in sorrow. Arjuna said: Krishna, when I see my own people gathered here, intent on fighting,
Sanjaya's narration gives way to Arjuna's speech within this verse. Verse divisions differ in some editions of this part of Chapter 1.
1.29
my limbs give way and my mouth dries up. My body trembles and my hair stands on end.
1.30
Gandiva slips from my hand and my skin burns. I cannot remain standing; my mind seems to reel.
1.31
I see ominous signs, Keshava, and can see no good in killing my own people in battle.
1.32
Krishna, I do not want victory, a kingdom, or its pleasures. Govinda, what use to us are sovereignty, enjoyment, or even life,
1.33
when those for whose sake we wanted a kingdom, enjoyment, and happiness stand here in battle, having put life and wealth aside?
1.34
Teachers, fathers, sons, grandfathers, maternal uncles, fathers-in-law, grandsons, brothers-in-law, and other relatives: they are all here.
1.35
I do not want to kill them, Madhusudana, even if they kill me; not for sovereignty over the three worlds, much less for the earth.
1.36
What joy would be ours after killing Dhritarashtra's sons, Janardana? Even though they are aggressors, killing them would bring wrongdoing upon us.
1.37
Therefore we ought not to kill Dhritarashtra's sons together with their kinsmen. How could we be happy after killing our own people, Madhava?
1.38
Even if they, their minds overcome by greed, do not see the harm in destroying a family or the wrong in betraying friends,
1.39
why should we not understand how to turn away from this wrong, Janardana, when we can see the harm that the destruction of a family brings?
1.40
When a family is destroyed, its ancient obligations perish. Once dharma has perished, disorder overwhelms the whole family.
1.41
When disorder prevails, Krishna, the women of the family become corrupted; when the women are corrupted, descendant of Vrishni, a mixing of social classes arises.
Verses 1.40–44 express Arjuna's fears in the inherited social and ritual language of the epic, including assumptions about women, lineage, and social classes. These are his arguments before Krishna's instruction, not the site's prescriptions for contemporary families or the worth of individuals.
1.42
Such mixing leads both the family's destroyers and the family to hell. Their ancestors fall, deprived of the rites of food and water offered to them.
1.43
Through these faults of those who destroy families, bringing about the mixing of social classes, the enduring duties of birth-group and family are uprooted.
1.44
We have heard, Janardana, that those whose family duties have been destroyed are destined to dwell in hell.
1.45
Alas, we have resolved upon a terrible wrong: driven by greed for the pleasures of kingship, we are ready to kill our own people.
1.46
It would be better for me if Dhritarashtra's armed sons killed me in battle, unarmed and offering no resistance.
1.47Sanjaya
Sanjaya said: Having spoken in this way on the battlefield, Arjuna sank down in the chariot, putting aside his bow and arrows, his mind shaken by grief.
A deeper reading
Questions worth
remaining with.
1.20–31
Compassion and confusion can coexist
Arjuna's compassion is not a minor obstacle to be brushed aside so that a lesson about courage can start. It brings the people affected by action into view. Yet feeling their importance does not by itself establish a complete answer to the conflict. The same attachment that opens recognition may also limit whose claims become visible. The chapter allows moral perception and uncertainty to occupy the same person at the same time.
This makes the opening more demanding than a simple endorsement or condemnation of Arjuna. A reader is asked to remain with the difficulty long enough to see its several elements. The next chapter will question his understanding, but it does so because his present arguments matter. The dialogue's educational force depends on a participant whose objections have substance, whose body is shaken, and whose familiar language of justification no longer suffices.
1.32–44
Read the social assumptions in their setting
Arjuna fears the collapse of the household and the loss of rites that connect generations. Those concerns help explain why a war can appear to destroy the very world its victors expect to inherit. His account also places responsibility for social continuity on women and invokes anxiety about the mixing of social classes. These are historically situated claims made by a character, not neutral descriptions of the worth of people.
Translation should not replace those difficult words with a comforting modern slogan. Commentary can make their position clear without treating inherited hierarchy as an ethical requirement for today's reader. The chapter gives us Arjuna's reasoning before Krishna's sustained response. Distinguishing speaker, circumstance, and claim protects both accuracy and moral attention. Reading carefully means hearing the argument in full while retaining the responsibility to examine what it assumes.
1.45–47
The pause that makes a dialogue possible
Arjuna's final gesture interrupts the expected action of a warrior on a battlefield. It does not yet constitute the teaching's conclusion. The distinction matters whenever this scene is read as an image of personal crisis. Stopping may reveal that an existing framework has failed, but it cannot guarantee that the next interpretation will be adequate. The chapter ends before the language of discipleship and instruction becomes explicit.
There is therefore no need to hurry past the last image in search of reassurance. A bow lies unused; a capable person cannot proceed. The Gita makes room for that suspension before offering an account of self, duty, action, and freedom. Its philosophical movement begins from an actual human difficulty, with relationships and consequences still present. Arjuna will eventually act, but the meaning of that action must be transformed through the conversation.
Sources & editions
The complete chapter is above. These optional external editions support further study; their modern translations and commentaries belong to their publishers.
Text, translation & sources