Chapter 02 · 72 verses
साङ्ख्ययोगः
Sāṅkhya-yoga
The ground of understanding
What can remain steady when everything changes?
The warrior who asked to see the armies now asks how to live with what he has seen. Krishna’s answer begins by changing the ground beneath the question.
What happens here
A turn in the
conversation.
Arjuna has lowered his bow. In the previous chapter he argued against the battle through the language of affection, kinship, wrongdoing and the collapse of family life. Now the argument reaches its most vulnerable point: he cannot see what could remove the grief consuming him. Neither a kingdom nor a victory over rivals would answer it. His crisis has become a question about the basis on which any decision could be made.
The decisive movement is in 2.7. Arjuna no longer speaks only as a friend disputing a course of action. He asks Krishna to teach him. This does not make his earlier objections disappear. It changes his relation to them. He acknowledges that what feels compelling may not yet be a sufficient understanding of what is right. The dialogue requires that admission before instruction can become more than an exchange of positions.
Krishna’s response moves across several registers. He distinguishes the enduring self from the changing body; he addresses Arjuna’s particular responsibility as a warrior; he describes an intelligence that can act without clinging to reward. These are connected movements, but they are not interchangeable. A metaphysical claim about the self is not the same as a social argument about duty, and neither can be reduced to advice for feeling better.
Near the end, Arjuna asks what a person of steady wisdom is like: how such a person speaks, sits and moves. The teaching becomes a portrait of life. Desire, attention, anger, memory and discernment enter the conversation. The chapter that began with collapse ends by asking what steadiness would look like in an embodied person moving through a world that continues to change.
I can no longer establish what is right. Teach me.
Look again at the self, at duty, and at the attachment carried into action.
How does a person of steady understanding actually live?
Chapter essence
Steadiness is not the absence of a difficult world. It is a transformation in how the self is understood, how desire is held, and how action is undertaken.
Key movements
Follow the
argument.
2.1–10
From argument to discipleship
Arjuna’s request for teaching does not arise from a lack of feeling. He feels acutely. The difficulty is that affection, obligation, fear of wrongdoing and the prospect of loss no longer arrange themselves into a clear answer. His surrender as a student is therefore not a convenient removal of moral complexity. It establishes a place from which that complexity can be examined. Sanjaya’s framing keeps the scene concrete: this conversation occurs between the assembled armies, before a decision has been resolved.
2.11–30
The changing body and the enduring self
Krishna distinguishes bodily transformation from the continuity of the self. Childhood, maturity and old age provide one familiar movement of change; death raises the question beyond what ordinary observation can settle. The teaching makes a strong claim about what is unborn and imperishable. It is not merely an image for personal resilience. At the same time, calling the self indestructible does not describe the body as safe from harm. The distinction matters precisely because bodies can be wounded and killed.
2.31–38
Arjuna’s particular responsibility
The argument turns explicitly to the warrior and this battle. Honour, social obligation and the consequences of retreat appear alongside the earlier account of the self. A responsible reading should let those arguments remain particular rather than convert every difficult situation into a Kurukshetra. The chapter’s instruction to treat gain and loss, pleasure and pain, victory and defeat with equanimity concerns the disposition of the agent. It does not make the ethical character of every possible action irrelevant.
2.39–53
An intelligence no longer owned by reward
Krishna introduces a discipline of understanding within action. Attention can become scattered when every act is driven by a desired return. The instruction in 2.47 addresses this relation to fruits while refusing attachment to inaction. It asks for an exacting balance: engage, but do not make the outcome a possession through which the self must be secured. This is why the passage cannot be exhausted by a slogan about working harder. Its subject is the inward structure of action and the freedom possible within it.
2.54–72
A portrait of steady wisdom
Arjuna’s question draws the teaching back toward recognisable human conduct. Krishna describes freedom from compulsive desire, steadiness amid attraction and aversion, and the preservation of discernment. The sequence from fixation to attachment, anger and the loss of understanding shows how a mind can narrow around an object until judgment collapses. The ocean image offers a different possibility: experience can arrive without determining the ground of the person who receives it. The final verses name the depth of that established state.
Selected key verses
Stay with the words.
The Sanskrit, an original translation, and a way into the meaning.
Bhagavad Gita 2.7Arjuna · in the dialogue
The courage to ask
My nature is overcome by the weakness of despair; my mind is bewildered about duty. I ask you: tell me decisively what would be truly good for me. I am your student. Teach me, for I have taken refuge in you.
Original King of Dwarka translation · Complete verse
Why this verse matters
Arjuna changes the terms of the conversation. He has offered reasons for withdrawing, but now admits that he cannot establish what is right. Asking for instruction is an act of seriousness: he places his own reasoning before a teacher rather than treating his first conviction as final.
Explore deeper
Kārpaṇya carries senses of weakness, narrowness or pitiable helplessness; no single English word covers the whole expression. Dharma here concerns what Arjuna ought to do, not simply a religious identity. The verse begins a sustained inquiry. It does not turn the rest of the dialogue into an instruction to stop questioning.
Bhagavad Gita 2.20Krishna · in the dialogue
What is not slain
The self is never born and never dies. Having been, it does not cease to be. Unborn, eternal, enduring and ancient, it is not slain when the body is slain.
Original King of Dwarka translation · Complete verse
Why this verse matters
Krishna distinguishes the enduring self from the body that changes and dies. The claim is central to his response to Arjuna’s grief, but it does not mean bodies are invulnerable or bereavement unreal. Read it within the larger argument about identity and action.
Explore deeper
The Sanskrit pronoun refers back to the self under discussion; ‘the self’ makes that reference explicit in English. The second line is syntactically compressed and permits differences of phrasing. This rendering expresses the self’s non-cessation. The verse alone does not settle every later disagreement about the relation of individual self and ultimate reality.
Bhagavad Gita 2.47Krishna · in the dialogue
Action without possession
Your responsibility is for action alone, never for its fruits. Do not make the fruit of action your motive, and do not become attached to inaction.
Original King of Dwarka translation · Complete verse
Why this verse matters
The verse joins commitment to action with relinquishment of a claim upon its fruit. Its last clause matters: refusing to act can itself become an attachment. Attending carefully to consequences and surrendering possessiveness about them are different questions.
Explore deeper
Adhikāra can mean right, entitlement or sphere of responsibility; it is not simply the modern idea of control. Karma-phala-hetu permits causal and motive-oriented readings. ‘Do not make the fruit your motive’ follows an established interpretive line. The Sanskrit should not be reduced to a promise that effort guarantees success or that results do not matter.
Bhagavad Gita 2.70Krishna · in the dialogue
The steadiness of the ocean
As waters enter the ocean, which remains steady though continually filled, so all desires enter the one who attains peace, not the one who longs to gratify desire.
Original King of Dwarka translation · Complete verse
Why this verse matters
The ocean receives water without losing its ground. Likewise, steadiness need not depend on a life without impressions, attractions or demands. Krishna contrasts someone who can receive them without being ruled by them with someone continually driven to satisfy desire.
Explore deeper
Kāmāḥ can indicate desires or desirable objects. The image supports both the arrival of inner cravings and the encounter with things that invite them. Peace is therefore not a blankness of experience. Nor is the ocean a clinical instruction for suppressing emotion. It belongs to the portrait of steady understanding in 2.54–72.
Read the full chapter
The whole conversation
matters.
All 72 verses, with Sanskrit, IAST transliteration and original King of Dwarka English.
Read Chapter 272 verses · Sanskrit & English
Use the peacock feather above to mark your place. Sources & editions
2.1Sanjaya
Sanjaya said: To Arjuna, overcome by compassion, his troubled eyes filled with tears and his mind in sorrow, Madhusudana spoke these words.
2.2Krishna
Krishna said: Where has this dejection come from at such a crisis, Arjuna? It is unworthy of the noble, leads away from heaven, and brings dishonour.
2.3
Do not yield to impotence, Partha; it does not befit you. Put aside this petty weakness of heart and stand up, scorcher of foes.
Klaibya is a gendered rebuke, literally impotence or unmanliness. It belongs to the warrior rhetoric of this exchange. The translation preserves its historical force without adopting it as a judgment of gender, grief, or human worth.
2.4Arjuna
Arjuna said: How can I fight Bhishma and Drona with arrows in battle, Madhusudana? They deserve my reverence, destroyer of enemies.
2.5
It would be better to live here on alms than to kill these great teachers. If I killed them, even though they seek worldly gain, the pleasures I enjoyed would be stained with blood.
Artha-kāmān can qualify the teachers as desiring material gain, as translated here. It can also be connected with the wealth and pleasures that Arjuna would enjoy. Either way, his fear is of enjoyment purchased through their blood.
2.6
Nor do we know which would be better for us: that we should conquer them or they should conquer us. Dhritarashtra's sons, after killing whom we would not wish to live, stand facing us.
2.7
My nature is overcome by the weakness of despair; my mind is bewildered about duty. I ask you: tell me decisively what would be truly good for me. I am your student. Teach me, for I have taken refuge in you.
2.8
I can see nothing that would remove this grief drying up my senses, even if I obtained a prosperous kingdom on earth without a rival, or sovereignty over the gods.
2.9Sanjaya
Sanjaya said: Having spoken to Hrishikesha in this way, Gudakesha, the scorcher of foes, told Govinda, 'I will not fight,' and became silent.
2.10
Then Hrishikesha, as though smiling, spoke these words to the sorrowing Arjuna between the two armies, descendant of Bharata.
2.11Krishna
Krishna said: You grieve for those who are not to be grieved for, yet speak words of wisdom. The discerning grieve neither for those whose life has departed nor for those whose life remains.
2.12
There was never a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor these rulers; nor will any of us cease to exist hereafter.
2.13
As the embodied self passes through childhood, youth, and age in this body, so it comes to another body. The steady person is not confused by this.
2.14
Contacts of the senses, son of Kunti, bring cold and heat, pleasure and pain. They come and go and do not endure. Bear them patiently, descendant of Bharata.
2.15
The steady person whom these do not trouble, who remains even in pain and pleasure, is fit for immortality, foremost of men.
2.16
The unreal has no enduring being; the real has no cessation. Those who see reality have discerned the limit of both.
Sat and asat can indicate the real and unreal, being and nonbeing, or the enduring and transient in this context. Traditions differ over their precise metaphysical referents. Read the claim with 2.17–25 rather than as a denial that pain is experienced.
2.17
Know as indestructible that by which all this is pervaded. No one can bring about the destruction of what does not diminish.
2.18
These bodies are said to have an end; the embodied self is enduring, indestructible, and beyond measure. Therefore fight, descendant of Bharata.
2.19
Both the person who thinks this self kills and the person who thinks it is killed fail to understand. It neither kills nor is killed.
2.20
The self is never born and never dies. Having been, it does not cease to be. Unborn, eternal, enduring and ancient, it is not slain when the body is slain.
2.21
One who knows this self as indestructible, enduring, unborn, and undiminished: how can that person kill anyone, Partha, or cause anyone to be killed?
2.22
As a person puts aside worn garments and takes other, new ones, so the embodied self puts aside worn bodies and enters other, new ones.
2.23
Weapons do not cut this self; fire does not burn it. Water does not wet it, and wind does not dry it.
2.24
It cannot be cut, burned, wetted, or dried. It is enduring, present everywhere, stable, unmoving, and ancient.
2.25
It is said to be unmanifest, beyond thought, and unchanging. Knowing it in this way, you should not grieve.
2.26
Even if you think this self is continually born and continually dies, mighty-armed one, you still should not grieve for it.
2.27
Death is certain for what is born, and birth is certain for what has died. Therefore you should not grieve over what cannot be avoided.
2.28
Beings are unmanifest at their beginning, manifest in between, and unmanifest again at their end, descendant of Bharata. What cause for lament is there in this?
2.29
One person sees this self as a wonder; another speaks of it as a wonder; another hears of it as a wonder. Yet even after hearing, someone may still not know it.
2.30
This embodied self in everyone's body is always beyond killing, descendant of Bharata. Therefore you should not grieve for any being.
2.31
Considering your own duty as well, you should not waver. For a warrior, nothing is better than a battle that accords with dharma.
The address in 2.31–38 concerns Arjuna's warrior duty in this particular conflict. Its account of a battle aligned with dharma is not a general permission for violence or a claim that any combatant's cause is just.
2.32
Fortunate are the warriors, Partha, to whom such a battle comes unbidden, opening the gate of heaven.
2.33
But if you do not undertake this battle of dharma, you will abandon your own duty and honour and incur wrongdoing.
2.34
People will speak of your lasting dishonour. For one who has been held in esteem, dishonour is worse than death.
2.35
The great chariot warriors will think you withdrew from battle through fear. Those who once esteemed you will come to think little of you.
2.36
Your enemies will speak many words unfit to be spoken, disparaging your strength. What could be more painful than that?
2.37
If killed, you will reach heaven; if victorious, you will enjoy the earth. Therefore rise, son of Kunti, resolved upon battle.
2.38
Holding pleasure and pain, gain and loss, victory and defeat alike, then engage in battle. In this way you will not incur wrongdoing.
2.39
This understanding has been explained to you through the way of knowledge. Now hear it through yoga, joined to which you will cast off the bond of action, Partha.
2.40
No effort is lost here, and no contrary result arises. Even a little of this discipline protects against great fear.
2.41
Here the understanding that is resolved has a single direction, joy of the Kurus. The understandings of the irresolute branch out without end.
2.42
The undiscerning delight in Vedic declarations and speak flowery words, Partha, saying that there is nothing beyond them.
2.43
Filled with desire and intent on heaven, they speak of rituals that yield birth as the fruit of action, multiplying particular observances for the attainment of enjoyment and power.
2.44
For those attached to enjoyment and power, whose minds are carried away by such words, a resolved understanding is not established in concentration.
2.45
The Vedas concern the realm of the three qualities. Go beyond the three qualities, Arjuna; be free of opposing pairs, always established in clarity, free from concern with acquisition and preservation, and self-possessed.
Sattva here is rendered as clarity. It can also be understood as purity or true being. The apparent tension between remaining in sattva and going beyond all three qualities receives different explanations in the commentarial traditions.
2.46
Whatever purpose a well serves when water floods everywhere, that is the purpose all the Vedas serve for a brahmin who understands.
2.47
Your responsibility is for action alone, never for its fruits. Do not make the fruit of action your motive, and do not become attached to inaction.
2.48
Established in yoga, perform actions while relinquishing attachment, Dhananjaya. Remain even in success and failure: this evenness is called yoga.
2.49
Action pursued for its reward is far inferior to the yoga of understanding, Dhananjaya. Seek refuge in understanding; pitiable are those whose motive is the fruit.
The Sanskrit says action is inferior to the yoga of understanding. 'Pursued for its reward' makes explicit the contrast supplied by the preceding verses and the second half of this verse; it is not an extra Sanskrit phrase.
2.50
One joined to understanding leaves behind both merit and wrongdoing here. Therefore devote yourself to yoga: yoga is skill in actions.
Skill here belongs to action governed by even understanding and freedom from binding results. It does not mean that efficiency or successful technique alone makes an action yoga.
2.51
The discerning, joined to understanding, relinquish the fruit born of action. Freed from the bond of birth, they reach the state without affliction.
2.52
When your understanding crosses beyond the thicket of confusion, you will become dispassionate toward what has been heard and what remains to be heard.
2.53
When your understanding, unsettled by what it hears, stands unmoving and steady in concentration, then you will attain yoga.
2.54Arjuna
Arjuna asked: How is a person of steady wisdom, established in concentration, described, Keshava? How does someone of settled understanding speak, sit, and move?
2.55Krishna
Krishna said: When a person relinquishes all the desires lodged in the mind, Partha, and is content in the self through the self alone, that person is called steady in wisdom.
2.56
One whose mind is untroubled in suffering, who does not crave pleasure, and who is free from attachment, fear, and anger is called a contemplative of settled understanding.
2.57
One who clings to nothing anywhere, neither rejoicing nor hating when good or bad arrives, has wisdom firmly established.
2.58
When a person withdraws the senses from their objects on every side, as a tortoise draws in its limbs, that person's wisdom is firmly established.
2.59
Sense objects withdraw from an embodied person who abstains, but the taste for them remains. Even that taste withdraws on seeing the highest.
2.60
The turbulent senses can forcefully carry away the mind even of a discerning person who is striving, son of Kunti.
2.61
Having restrained them all, one should remain gathered in yoga, with me as the highest aim. Wisdom is firmly established in one whose senses are under control.
2.62
When a person dwells upon sense objects, attachment to them arises. From attachment comes desire, and from desire anger arises.
2.63
From anger comes confusion; from confusion, the disturbance of memory; from the loss of memory, the destruction of discernment. When discernment is destroyed, the person is lost.
2.64
But a self-governed person moving among objects with senses under control, free from attraction and aversion, attains serenity.
2.65
In that serenity, all suffering begins to fall away. For a person of serene mind, understanding quickly becomes steady.
2.66
Without inner discipline there is no settled understanding, and without it no sustained contemplation. Without contemplation there is no peace; without peace, where is happiness?
2.67
When the mind follows the wandering senses, it carries away discernment, as wind carries a boat across the water.
2.68
Therefore, mighty-armed one, wisdom is firmly established in the person whose senses are restrained on every side from their objects.
2.69
The self-restrained person is awake in what is night to all beings. What beings are awake to is night to the contemplative who sees.
2.70
As waters enter the ocean, which remains steady though continually filled, so all desires enter the one who attains peace, not the one who longs to gratify desire.
2.71
One who leaves all desires behind and moves through life without craving, without the claim of 'mine' and without egotism, reaches peace.
2.72
This is the state of Brahman, Partha. Having reached it, one is no longer confused. Established in it even at the final hour, one reaches liberation in Brahman.
A deeper reading
Questions worth
remaining with.
2.11–30
Grief is the setting, not a failure to conceal
The chapter can be read too quickly as a command to stop grieving. Its dramatic setting resists that simplification. Arjuna’s grief is what exposes the inadequacy of his current understanding and brings the conversation into being. Krishna challenges the conclusions Arjuna draws, but the text does not begin with a serene person whose feelings have already been resolved. The teaching enters at the point where human understanding is under strain.
The distinction between self and body is a philosophical and religious claim. It should be presented as such, without treating it as an experimentally established account of bereavement or using it to demand that a mourner feel nothing. Within the dialogue it opens a different horizon for identity. Whether and how that horizon changes action must still be worked through in the rest of the Gita.
2.47–50
Detachment does not exempt action from judgment
A person can care about whether work is done well without treating its result as the measure of their entire being. That distinction helps modern readers approach the chapter, but it should not replace the Sanskrit with a productivity formula. Krishna is discussing action, bondage and release within a much larger teaching about the self. The fruits at issue are not only applause or immediate success.
The final prohibition against attachment to inaction closes a tempting escape. Renouncing a possessive claim on results cannot be used to justify refusal of responsibility. Equally, the verse does not make all activity good simply because it is undertaken without anxiety. What ought to be done and how one relates to its fruits remain connected questions. Chapter 3 will press their relationship much further.
2.54–72
Steadiness is tested in relation
The portrait of steady wisdom is not only a picture of someone sitting alone. Arjuna asks about speech and movement as well as stillness. The senses, the world they encounter and the intelligence that interprets experience remain present. The problem is domination by attraction and aversion, not the mere fact of contact with life.
This gives the ocean image its force. Peace is not secured by preventing every river from arriving. Yet the metaphor should not be pushed into emotional numbness or a claim that mature people never struggle. It describes the orientation of the chapter’s ideal. Reading toward that ideal requires the patience to distinguish a direction of practice from an immediate performance of perfection.
Sources & editions
The complete chapter is above. These optional external editions support further study; their modern translations and commentaries belong to their publishers.
Text, translation & sources